Understand the asset. Respect the process. Control the change.
Build technical visibility around the operational constraints of industrial and connected environments. TRILOGY helps define the requirement and integration scope; intrusive testing and operational changes require the asset owner’s approval and the appropriate specialist involvement.
When this solution is relevant
Asset visibility
Identify observed industrial and connected devices with documented coverage.
Communication mapping
Review observed dependencies between operational zones and services.
Exposure prioritization
Combine known vulnerabilities with asset role and operational context.
Remote maintenance controls
Define approved access paths, accountability and session limits.
Technology options
Technology options to evaluate against your requirement. Product capabilities, editions and integrations are confirmed in the agreed configuration.
Platforms
- Armis
Armis — Armis Centrix
- Asset intelligence across supported IT, OT, IoT and other asset classes
- Exposure context helps prioritize security risks
- Integrations connect asset findings to remediation workflows
- Claroty
Claroty — xDome / CTD / xDome Secure Access
- xDome provides modular CPS visibility and risk management
- CTD is evaluated for on-premises monitoring requirements
- xDome Secure Access governs supported remote-access workflows
- Dragos
Dragos — Dragos Platform
- OT-focused asset visibility and network security monitoring
- Risk-based vulnerability workflows informed by industrial context
- Threat detection supports investigation within the selected OT coverage
- Nozomi Networks
Nozomi Networks — Guardian / Vantage / Arc
- Guardian provides network monitoring and asset visibility
- Vantage supports cloud management where permitted by deployment requirements
- Arc is a host-based sensor that complements network visibility
Microsoft — Defender for IoT
- OT network sensors support asset visibility and threat detection
- Architecture can include supported cloud-connected or isolated monitoring
- OT site licensing and Defender portal availability require specific review
The Defender portal documentation identifies a preview experience; do not assume parity with existing Azure-managed deployments.
Official product reference- Forescout
Forescout — eyeInspect
- OT/ICS device visibility and network insight
- CPS-focused monitoring complements access-control technologies
- Deployment requirements are reviewed separately from eyeControl NAC
Additional OT technology options
Cisco — Cyber Vision
- Industrial network visibility through distributed sensors
- Protocol-aware asset and communication analysis
- Remote-access enforcement requires the appropriate separate Cisco components
- Tenable
Tenable — Tenable One OT Exposure
- Combines passive monitoring with supported Safe Active Querying
- Device and exposure context supports risk prioritization
- Active collection requires asset-owner approval and compatibility review
Names and trademarks belong to their owners.
What we verify
Observed inventory
Observed assets reconciled with owner-validated records.
Coverage limitations
Unobserved segments, protocols and offline devices recorded explicitly.
Dependency verification
Communication maps reviewed with the operational owner.
Approved change tests
Results and exceptions recorded within authorized operational conditions.
How the technical work is scoped
01
Requirement and operational scope
Identify assets, facilities, system owners and change restrictions. Confirm the required industrial expertise before selecting a deployment approach.
02
Architecture and integration
Define approved visibility points, identity integrations and access-control interfaces. Product selection must account for protocols and manufacturer restrictions.
03
Verification with the asset owner
Acceptance scenarios and changes are reviewed with the operational owner and relevant specialists. Handover includes observed coverage, exceptions and approved procedures.
Technical scope in detail
Discovery methods are not identical
Passive observation, host sensors and active queries have different operating characteristics. The exact method is checked for each product and target. No active collection is assumed safe without review.
Inventory needs validation
Network observations provide an initial asset view, not guaranteed completeness. Offline devices and unobserved segments remain possible gaps. The owner validates identifiers, roles and criticality.
Exposure in operational context
A vulnerability finding is reviewed alongside process criticality, vendor guidance and available compensating controls. Patch and replacement decisions follow operational approval. The evidence separates observed facts from inferred risk.
Segmentation and remote access
Communication dependencies are mapped before policy enforcement. Remote-maintenance access is governed by identity, authorization and time limits. Tests require approved conditions and a recovery path.
Protect process continuity
Automatic quarantine, scanning and configuration changes are not enabled by default. Safety and process constraints govern the response. Required specialists and the asset owner approve operational interventions.
Licensing and sizing
Review the industrial asset count, supported protocols, sensor placement and discovery methods. Product licensing does not include an assumption of operational engineering, safety validation or unrestricted access to equipment.
What to share with us
Asset owners and sites; process restrictions; manufacturer guidance; topology; approved discovery methods.
What you receive
Agreed scope and architecture
Selected configuration and integration record
Approved change and rollback plan
Test record and documented exceptions
Operating procedures and technical handover
Frequently asked questions
Is every OT tool agentless?
No. Portfolios may combine passive sensors, host-based components and supported active queries. Each method requires its own review.
Can we scan or isolate equipment immediately?
Only within an approved scope that accounts for process safety, manufacturer guidance and operational dependencies.
Does installing a platform establish OTCC compliance?
No. Applicable controls involve governance, people, processes and technical evidence beyond a product deployment.
Discuss the requirement
Tell us what you need to protect, change or recover. We will use the details to define the next technical discussion.
Prefer to talk? Call +966591909277